Buy essays for college
Sunday, August 23, 2020
Friday, August 21, 2020
Drunk as drunk free essay sample
Tanked as smashed This sonnet is about the licentious connection between two individuals. The pair lay in the blossoms under the night sky and kiss each other until what appears months after the fact. I think the couple portrayed are in the beginning periods of their relationship. They go through the entire day with their bodies squeezed against each other and kiss in the blossoms. They are so devoured in one another that they disregard rest, food, and water. I think its every one of the somewhat overstated yet it is certainly portraying a youthful, energetic love. Neruda utilizes numerous likenesses in this sonnet for the impact of making a couple of desire filled sweethearts. He compares them to angle under a net of our kisses. The two get to know each other, and cant consider something besides that. He likewise utilizes symbolism, saying miour wet body wedged between my wet body and the strake of our vessel that is made of blossoms. He utilizes symbolism to portray two darlings lying on the grass, and squeezed against every others bodies. He causes it to appear the desire (and love) between these individuals is wedged together, I. . indistinguishable. The tone of the sonnet is cherishing and sentimental. The storyteller is one of the darlings, which makes you see their association better. The utilization of analogies, illustrations and tone in this sonnet show the quality of Nerudas composing. He makes you alcoholic as alcoholic on turpentine from his composition. Young lady. Topics The Danger of Female Sexuality Even however the girl doesnt appear to have yet arrived at pre-adulthood, the mother stresses that her present conduct, whenever proceeded, will prompt an existence of wantonness. The mother accepts that a womans notoriety or decency decides an incredible nature in the network. Sexuality, in this manner, must be painstakingly monitored and even hidden to keep up a good front. Subsequently, the mother joins numerous angential items and undertakings to the untouchable subject of sexuality, for example, crushing bread before getting it, and a lot of her recommendation focuses on the best way to maintain decency. She reprimands her little girl for the manner in which she strolls, the manner in which she plays marbles, and how she identifies with others. The moms steady accentuation on this subject shows the amount she needs her girl to understand that she isn't a kid and that she needs to act such that will win her regard from the network. The Transformative Power of Domesticity The mother accepts that residential information won't just spare her girl from an ife of indiscrimination and ruin yet will likewise engage her as the leader of her family and a profitable individual from the network. She fundamentally accepts that there are just two sorts of ladies: the good kind and the prostitutes. Without a doubt for some Antiguan ladies, household information prompts profitability, which thusly wins regard from family and society. Family work in this way brings power and even eminence to ladies notwithstanding keeping them occupied and away from enticement. Perusers perceive the respect the mother has for the intensity of family life on account of the various explicit directions she gives her girl, for example, how to ook pumpkin squand ers, clear, develop okra, purchase bread, and wash garments. For her, home life brings decency; closing up a dress trim along these lines turns out to be in excess of a network. Themes The mother over and again underscores food all through her talk to strengthen her conviction that satisfaction originates from home life. The actsâ⬠and artâ⬠of making pumpkin misuses, tea, bread pudding, doukona, and pepper pot in this manner take on more noteworthy importance as components that interface ladies to their families, their families, and the more noteworthy network. From various perspectives, food will likewise be the moms most prominent heritage as he passes old family plans and culinary conventions down to her little girl and people in the future of ladies. Strangely, nourishments, for example, doukonaand pepper pot additionally go about as grapples that solidly place the story in Antigua and the Caribbean. Referencing these particular territorial nourishments permits Kincaid to reproduce a world that is distinctive and not quite the same as our own without destroying the storys structure with pointless portrayals. Fabric Cloth and its relationship to appearances and appropriate housekeeping return all through the story to feature the significance of decency. The mother knows cap a people dress uncovers much about character and character and that pitifulness infers apathy and destitution. Washing, sewing, and pressing permit ladies not exclusively to extend their status yet in addition their profitability and self-esteem. Tidiness in appearance additionally compares to the communitys impression of a womans sexual decency and ethical quality. Sorted out, gainful, all around prepped ladies seem equipped and in charge and thusly have considerably less possibility of falling under doubt of having had illegal associations with men. The mother in this manner focuses on the significance of dress and appearance to spare the little girl from an existence of isrespect. Images Benna Antiguan folksongs, or benna, represent sexuality, a subject the mother fears her little girl definitely knows a lot about. Verifiably, local Antiguans sangbenna to furtively spread outrageous bits of gossip and tattle under the uncomprehending British people groups noses. Singing benna in Sunday school, accordingly, speaks to rebellion as well as evil, prohibited information that cant be examined straightforwardly out in the open, let alone in chapel. Despite the fact that the little girl may not intentionally liken benna with sexuality as her mom does, her protestations in any case uggest she realizes beyond any doubt bennas alluring force, persona, and taboo characteristics.
Tuesday, July 14, 2020
Business Continuity Plan For Boots Pharmacy Example
Business Continuity Plan For Boots Pharmacy Example Business Continuity Plan For Boots Pharmacy â" Assignment Example > @2010Table of ContentsIntroduction Business continuity is categorically one of the essential management processes that deal with the identification of threats that may affect an organization and the impacts of the identified threats on the normal operations of a business organization. The identification of threats that may impact an organization, form a fundamental framework that can be used to develop reliance which is the ability of an organization to effectively respond to threats and protect the key stakeholders within the organization. In addition to adding reliance, the other contributions of the development of a business continuity plan to an organization include aspects such as restoring the ability of an organization to supply essential services, increasing the capacity to manage disruptions that may affect the business and assisting in complimenting of the process of risk management (Doughty 2001). Aims of the Report The aim of the report is to devise a business continui ty plan for one of the biggest Pharmaceutical companies in the U. K known as the Boots Pharmaceuticals which is ranked under the category two of the 2005 civil contingencies Act. It is very much necessary for well established organization like the Boots organization to formulate business continuity plans that can assist the organization handle threats or even disruptions that may affect the organizations normal functioning. The documented procedures of the plan are collected and the information is compiled in readiness for use to enable an organization carry out its operations as usual in despite of disruption. The purpose of the document will therefore focus creating a well developed business continuity that will assist Boots Pharmaceutical Company to be well prepared for any incoming threats and also ensure that the organization is safe at all times. The Scope of the Report The report will cover several aspects such as understanding the organization this is through an evaluation of the history of the organization and the evaluation of the main activities undertaken by the organization. The plan will also involve the aspect of risk assessment which mainly entails the evaluation for the critical dependencies within the organization. In order to come up with a business continuity plan that useful for the pharmacy it is vital that the plan has to undergo verification and validation by the organizationâs management. Boots Pharmacy Operating Environment Boots limited is one of the top pharmaceutical companies in the U. K. presently the organization has 2,600 stores which are mainly health and beauty stores. The business has outlets in many regions in the U. K. In addition the organization has extended its operations outside to other countries in Europe such as the Republic of Island and Norway. The Boots Company can be categorized under a privately owned company; therefore its shares are not listed or traded on the stock exchange market. The business has for many years operated under transfer of ownership every since its initiation. The Pharmacy can be stated as an organization with a long history. It was first started by John Boots in 1849. The company was restructured to a pure drug store in with a number of subsidiary firms such the Lancs Cash boots chemists were founded, in 1988. In 1920 the business was later sold to the United Drug Company located in America by Jesse Boot. However due to the weakening economic situation in North America, the company was sold back in 1933 to British management and Edinburgh (Britton 1988). The organization managed to establish 180 shops by the end of the 19th Centaury. In the 1990s the company expanded its operations further by opening a drug manufacturing plant in Cramlington, it also begun to diversify its operations by operating a car and bicycle parts business.
Thursday, May 21, 2020
Animal Rights Quotes by Alice Walker and Others
Supporters of the animal rights movement and their opponents often use quotes to bolster their arguments. Unfortunately, some of these quotes are taken out of context, misattributed, or otherwise incorrectly used. Famous quotes about animal rights, from Paul McCartney to the Bible, are explored and explained here. Alice Walker One quote taken out of context is attributed to writer Alice Walker. Its a beautiful quote clearly about animal rights: The animals of the world exist for their own reasons. They were not made for humans any more than black people were made for whites or women for men. Its one of the most famous quotes bandied about in the animal rights movement. The fact that it is attributed to the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of The Color Purple, a book that inspired aà movie by the same name, as well as a Broadway musical, makes it all the more credible and poignant. The problem is the quote is taken out of context, and Walker wasnt expressing her own views. The source of the quote is Walkers preface to Marjorie Spiegels 1988 book, The Dreaded Comparison. In fact, the very next sentence is This is the gist of Ms. Spiegels cogent, humane and astute argument, and it is sound. So Walker was simply summarizing someone elses views, not her own. Its easy to see how something like this spreads. Its a great sentiment, coming from a Pulitzer Prize-winning author. And technically, Alice Walker did write it. Adolf Hitler Critics of the animal rights movement, and specifically the aspect of it that involves vegetarianism, are quick to point out that Adolf Hitler was a vegetarian. Buzz such as this is a phenomenon of the internet age where misinformation spreads like wildfire if said information furthers oneââ¬â¢s agenda. This rumor allegedly started because in his article in Psychology Today writer Hal Hertzogà reported that Hitler was overheard telling a female companion who ordered sausage while they were on a date: ââ¬Å"I didnââ¬â¢t think you wanted to devour a dead corpseâ⬠¦the flesh of dead animals. Cadavers!â⬠Subsequent inquiry and research have proven that Hitler was not a vegetarian, a fact clearly indicated in a 1964 Gourmet Cooking Schoolà Cookbook written by Dione Lucas, who spoke openly about Herr Hitlerââ¬â¢s favorite meat dishes. So much for anti-animal rights people trying to demonstrate a link between vegetarians and the worldââ¬â¢s most evil bastard. Other Quotes About Animal Rights Paul McCartney was a vegan who famously and openly discussed his vegan lifestyle. He actually did say: ââ¬Å"You can judge a mans true character by the way he treats his fellow animals.â⬠Paul and his late wife Linda McCartney were both proponents of animal rights. Linda wrote in her book Lindas Kitchen: Simple and Inspiring Recipes for Meals Without Meat wrote: ââ¬Å"If slaughterhouses had glass walls, the whole world would be vegetarian.â⬠à Writer Ralph Waldo Emerson also spoke of slaughterhouses, saying: ââ¬Å"You have just dined, and however scrupulously the slaughterhouse is concealed in the graceful distance of miles, there is complicity.â⬠à Other quotes about animals and vegetarianism have been borrowed from other social movements. The context of these quotes is not directly related to animal rights, but the message is applied to the argument in favor of animal rights. Dr. Martin Luther King said: ââ¬Å"Lifes most persistent and urgent question is, What are you doing for others?â⬠There are other quotes related to social movements that are attributed to Dr. King and used for animal rights. This includes: Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. Animal rights critics are also famous for citing biblical references to support their claim that people are supposed to use animals any way they desire, including eating them. This often used argument stems from Genesis 1:26-28:à Let us makeà manà in Our image, according to Our likeness; and ...let them haveà dominion overà the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air.à Some theologians have suggested that the word ââ¬Å"dominionâ⬠was translated incorrectly and should actually be ââ¬Å"stewardship.â⬠Though Susan B. Anthonyà likely was not responding to the use of the Bible to oppose animal rights, she did say: ââ¬Å"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do, because I notice it always coincides with their own desires.â⬠à While there is no evidence to support the idea that King or Anthony were vegetarians, their words are universal. Is there any harm in commissioning their moving words to inspire a kinder world? -Edited and updated by Michelle A. Rivera
Wednesday, May 6, 2020
Analysis Of Albert Camuss The Stranger - 1070 Words
ââ¬Å"The Strangerâ⬠by Albert Camus is a thought provoking novel that questions morality, society, justice, religion, and individuality. Camus creates a man that goes against societyââ¬â¢s idea of the ââ¬Å"normalâ⬠moral standards, making Meursault a stranger in his world. Meursaultââ¬â¢s lack of emotion and sympathy towards others is what makes this novel so intriguing. The morbidity expressed by his character makes the book hard to read but also difficult to put down. A majority of people today as well as in Meursaultââ¬â¢s time know that lying is wrong, but it is better than dying as a consequence of oneââ¬â¢s actions. However, Camus creates a man that is a foil to this idea, and Meursault is made an outsider due to his difference in moral standards, bringingâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦This realization demonstrates the lack of control that people have over time, and by association, death. The reader assumes that since Salamano and his dog grow old together, they may die together. Close to Meursaultââ¬â¢s execution, the chaplain asks, ââ¬Å"But if you donââ¬â¢t die today, youââ¬â¢ll die tomorrow, or the next day. And then the same question will arise. How will you face that terrifying ordeal?â⬠(Camus 117). Death, unpredictable and uncontrollable, will occur when it wishes, and through his indifference to time, Meursault asserts that getting upset over something known to be inevitable provides as useless. Meursault doesnââ¬â¢t care about anything enough to stay alive. The question is brought up: Is he depressed? He canââ¬â¢t be, because if he were, then he would have to care about something enough to be depressed about it. Weââ¬â¢ve all had periods in life where weââ¬â¢ve felt down and didnââ¬â¢t care one way or the other for the world around us, but the degree of Meursaultââ¬â¢s view on life is extreme. He feels nothing for anyone, not even himself. The inability to feel, care, and remorse is not relatable and is inhumane to the normal society. The reader canââ¬â¢t help but try to understand some of the reasoning he has because it is so obscure to us. The meaninglessness he feels towards oneââ¬â¢s actions draws the readerââ¬â¢s interest, causing us to be more understanding of Meursaultââ¬â¢s morbid perspective on life. The message brilliantly conveyed by Camus makes sense and holds weight. The story is aShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of Albert Camuss The Stran ger1027 Words à |à 5 PagesIn The Stranger, the admirable short novel translated in English, Albert Camus expresses the tragedy of integrity as a modern man can sense it. Meursault, the protagonist, projects Camus philosophy of absurdism, an extension of existentialism, by exploring the seemingly random meaninglessness of life. Thus, Mersalt is the epitome of a absurd man and acts accordingly throughout the progression of the novel. The story is centered around three deaths: that of his mother, the arab, and his own. In eachRead MoreLiterary Analysis: How Meursault Is Indifferent in the Stranger, by Albert Camus874 Words à |à 4 PagesLiterary analysis: How Meursault is indifferent in The Stranger, by Albert Camus Although Meursault is the title character and narrator of Albert Camusââ¬â¢ short novel The Stranger, he is also a somewhat flat character. His apparent indifferent demeanor may be a convenience to Camus, who mainly wanted to display his ideas of absurdism. And as a flat character, Meursault is not fully delineated: he lacks deep thought and significant change. His purpose is that of a first-person narrator whose actionsRead MoreHuman Relations in Camus Novel, The Outsider, from an Existentialist View2123 Words à |à 9 Pagesmovements across time. The human relations with God, love, society, death etcâ⬠¦ are relations that human make to live his life. I study in this paper the human relations in The Outsider novel by Albert Camus from an existentialist view. I want to study Meursault relations who is the main character in Albert Camusââ¬â¢s novel The Outsider , Meursault is being executed because he kills an arab person, but the main reason is that he does not cry at hi s motherââ¬â¢ funeral and lives his life as there is nothingRead MoreThe Individual Versus His Environment in The Stranger and Grendel1674 Words à |à 7 Pages The Individual Versus His Environment in The Stranger and Grendel Due to the multifaceted nature of literature, analysis thereof is prone to generalization. One of the most grievous generalizations oft encountered involves failing to distinguish between a character and the novel it inhabits. Take John Gardenerââ¬â¢s Grendel and Albert Camusââ¬â¢s The Stranger, for instance. Itââ¬â¢s far too easy, when analyzing for dominant ideologies, to slap them both with the label of existentialism and be done withRead MoreLiterary Analysis Of The Stranger 2900 Words à |à 12 Pages Curtis Poindexter Professor Slattum English M01B 11 December 2014 Literary Analysis: The Stranger The novel The Stranger is a first-person account of the life of M. Meursault from the time of his mother s death up to a time evidently just before his execution for the murder of an Arab. It was written by Albert Camus in 1942. Meursault however, is not your typical hero of a story; rather an antihero. He is neither good nor bad, and harbors no emotion. He goes through his life with a preconceived
Changes in Soviet Values Free Essays
Changes in Soviet Values Films in the Soviet Union during Stalinââ¬â¢s rule were primarily made for propaganda purposes. Some of the most famous films at the time were ââ¬Å"Chapaev,â⬠ââ¬Å"Circus,â⬠and ââ¬Å"Moscow Doesnââ¬â¢t Believe in Tears,â⬠which were all were aimed at describing Soviet Values during and after Stalinââ¬â¢s rule. The film ââ¬Å"Chapaevâ⬠was produced in 1934 and was set during the Russian Civil War, and like ââ¬Å"Circus,â⬠which was produced two years later, they both reflected Soviet ideals of Stalinââ¬â¢s rule. We will write a custom essay sample on Changes in Soviet Values or any similar topic only for you Order Now ââ¬Å"Moscow Doesnââ¬â¢t Believe in Tearsâ⬠was produced in 1980, and it showed the changes in Soviet values after Stalinââ¬â¢s reign in the 1950ââ¬â¢s and 1970ââ¬â¢s. Even though each of these propaganda films is set in different time periods, each one illustrates the changing social values of that time. The movie ââ¬Å"Chapaevâ⬠was directed by the Vasilyev brothers and was produced in 1934. The movie depicts the story of a soldier made commander named Vasily Ivanovich Chapaev, who led the Red Army to victory in the Russian Civil War. The main theme portrayed in ââ¬Å"Chapaevâ⬠is the idea of ââ¬Å"social realism,â⬠and to show this the producers tell the story of the Soviet principals of equality within society, and the growth of the party. In one scene of the movie, Chapaevââ¬â¢s men loot local farmers, and Chapaevââ¬â¢s newly appointed commissar arrests the men involved and return the livestock. Initially, Chapaev was angry with his new commissar for arresting his men, as he feels he was undermining Chapaevââ¬â¢s power, but he learned to agree with him because the peasants supported him upon the safe return of their livestock. Chapaevââ¬â¢s new commissar explained to him that the entire war was being fought for the peasants, and by stealing from them it was hurting their image. This scene shows the equality within society that the Bolsheviks party was going for, and therefore the party gained more support. This scene in particular was propaganda because in war, armies do steal from farms, thatââ¬â¢s just a fact, but when they return the livestock it makes the Bolshevik party look patriotic and respectful. In this movie Chapaev is portrayed as a flawless example of what a Soviet man should be like. He is a man who believes in every man being equal and in order for a party to strive it has to be focused on the needs of the group not just the individual. In Soviet History Chapaev is considered a hero and rightly so, his stand against theft and sacrifice for the war effort makes him an ideal Soviet man. The movie ââ¬Å"Circusâ⬠was directed by Grigori Aleksandrov and was produced in 1936. Similar to the movie ââ¬Å"Chapaev,â⬠the theme in ââ¬Å"Circusâ⬠is focused on equality in the society and the growth of the party. The movie depicts the story of Orlova, an American circus artist who is forced to flee the racism in America after giving birth to a black baby. Orlova ends up in Russia and start her circus career there, and she becomes a huge star. In fear of being exposed, Orlova stays in the circus and works for her cruel German boss von Kneishitz. Von Kneishitz is the only person in Moscow who knows about her black baby, but he is also the only person in Russia who cares that her baby is black. The movie climaxes with the revealing of her baby to her beloved audience, but in contrary to what Kneishitz thought would happen, the audience shows the baby love by passing him around and singing a lullaby to him. When Marion asks the Ring Master to explain everyoneââ¬â¢s reaction, he says, ââ¬Å"In our country, we absolutely love children. You may have a child of any color here: black, white, red, or even striped like a zebra or polka-dotted. Whateverââ¬â¢s your pleasure! â⬠It cannot be denied that this movie is a propaganda film. It portrays that everyone is equal in the Soviet Union and that everyone is antiracist. In fact, in the 1930ââ¬â¢s Jews were highly discriminated against, as proof through public anti-Semitism. Therefore, we see the films impression of racial equality as false. The movie ââ¬Å"Moscow Doesnââ¬â¢t Believe in Tears,â⬠(ââ¬Å"Moscowâ⬠for short) was directed by Vladimir Menshov and was produced in 1980. The movie begins in the 1950ââ¬â¢s and goes until the 1970ââ¬â¢s. Although this film accurately shows a change in Soviet ideals, it is important to note that ââ¬Å"Moscowâ⬠does have some levels of propaganda. For example, Katerinaââ¬â¢s lover, Gosha, is seen as the ideal model citizen, especially when Katerina and Gosha talk about how Gosha is perfect and flawless. It need not be said that nobody is perfect, but the films portrays Gosha as the ideal citizen. This time period was significant in Soviet history because it showed a transition in Soviet values. This movie shows how traditional values in the Soviet Union became modernized as time progressed in the post Stalin era. During the 1970ââ¬â¢s, the Soviet Union became neo-traditionalist, in the sense that they held on to their old values while attaining new ones. For example, we get a clear understanding of how Russia was adjusting to time with the development of Tonya, Ludmilla, and Katerinaââ¬â¢s live styles. Of all the three main women in the play, Tonya is the best example of a traditional Soviet lifestyle. She marries at a young age and settles for a domestic life with a man that makes a respectable living. Katerina, on the other hand, marries at a much older age but to a man named Gosha who exhibits traditional Soviet values as well. For example, after Gosha gets in a fight, Katerina forbids him from ever fighting again, and Gosha agrees, but tells Katerina if she ever yells at him again he will leave her. Later in the same conversation, Gosha tells Katerina that it goes against his values that a woman makes more money than a man. This shows that there are still traces of traditional Soviet values in 1970 Russia. Tonya and Gosha both show that there are links to traditional soviet values even though its thirty years after Stalinââ¬â¢s reign. In contrast to the way Tonya and Gosha live, the lives of Ludmilla and Katerina give us examples of how Soviet values changed and modernized over time. For example, in the beginning of the film, signs of change in Soviet values are apparent. Early in the film, Katerina and Ludmilla go to the French Film Festival to admire the rich and famous. Ludmilla admits to Katerina how she thinks one of the female actresses is beautiful, and how she would love to live the life of her. This shows how people, especially women, were being exposed to materialism in Russia, and it was socially acceptable to aspire to be rich and famous. Katerina also shows a change in Soviet values for women. She is the head of a corporation after a series of floor promotions, and she lives in a nice apartment providing for her family. This is a perfect example of Soviet values changing from the idea that women in the Soviet Union didnââ¬â¢t have rights or power, to the modernized Soviet values where women were powerful. In conclusion, the movies ââ¬Å"Chapaev,â⬠ââ¬Å"Circus,â⬠and ââ¬Å"Moscow Doesnââ¬â¢t Believe in Tearsâ⬠are all largely applauded films that show the history and progression of changing Soviet values. ââ¬Å"Chapaevâ⬠and ââ¬Å"Circusâ⬠were both produced under Stalinââ¬â¢s reign, and they both contain some amount of Soviet propaganda as well as accurate references to Soviet values. They portray the traditional Soviet ideals of equality and unity of the Bolshevik party and how they were foremost in Soviet society. On a different note, ââ¬Å"Moscowâ⬠takes place in a much later time, and proves that some Stalin era Soviet ideals were kept, but the attempt for modernization brought a necessary change in the ways people lived. As a result of the two sets of values portrayed through Gosha and Tonya, and Ludmilla and Katerina respectively, we see that Soviet ideals eventually became neo-traditionalistic. The shift in Soviet ideals occurred because Stalinââ¬â¢s long and influential reign came to an end. After such a long time of repression, it can be argued that this change was inevitable. How to cite Changes in Soviet Values, Papers
Friday, April 24, 2020
Social Control Essays - Philosophy, Humanities, Michel Foucault
Social Control Both Michel Foucault and Truffaut's depiction of a disciplinary society are nearly identical. But Truffaut's interpretation sees more room for freedom within the disciplinary society. The difference stems from Foucault's belief that the social control in disciplinary pervades all elements of life and there is no escape from this type of control. Foucault's work deals mostly with "power" and his conception of it. Like Nietzsche, Foucault sees power not as a fixed quantity of physical force, but instead as a stream of energy flowing through all aspects of society, its power harnesses itself in regulating the behavior of individuals, the systems of knowledge, a societies institutions, and every interaction between people. Foucault in "Discipline and Punish", applies this notion of power in tracing the rise of the prison system in France and the rise of other coercive institutions such as monasteries, the army, mental asylums, and other technologies. In his work Foucault exposes how seemingly benign or even reformist institutions such as the modern prison system (versus the stocks, and scaffolds) are technologies that are typical of the modern, painless, friendly, and impersonal coercive tools of the modern world. In fact the success of these technologies stems from their ability to appear unobtrusive and humane. These prisons Foucault goes on to explain like many institutions in post 1700th century society isolate those that society deems abnormal. This isolation seeks to attack the souls of people in order to dominate them similar to how the torture and brutality of pre-1700th century society sought to dominate the physical bodies of prisoners. In Foucault's interpretation freedom from the pervasive influence of "power" is impossible. Because his conception of "power" exists not just in individual institutions of society like prisons but instead exists in the structure of society and more importantly in peoples thought systems, escape from social control is impossible. Foucault in the last chapter talks about how even the reforms in the system have been co-opted to further the goals of the state. Instead of a lessening of social control Foucault sees that the technologies change from the wheels and gallows of the 17th century to the disciplinary society of the 19th century to the emerging carceral city of the future. In this carceral city the dispersion of power will be complete. The technologies of control will emanate from all parts of society, "walls, space, institution, rules, and discourse." Truffaut's interpretation of society and its future is much more upbeat. Although like Foucault he sees the technologies of the disciplinary society as insidious social control mechanisms. Truffault depicts the schooling, prison, and family systems as technologies that seeks to inculcate children, criminals, and subversives in the proper behavior of society. Trauffaut's film exposes how these mechanisms work. The school seeks to isolate punish and ostracize children into forming a pliant populace. The family seeks to enforce the discipline of societies larger moral codes on children. Notice how in the movie the mother in a seemingly kindly attempt to bond with her child is in fact teaching him the moral codes of society: running away from home is wrong, school is good, respect your elders, follow rules, and don't lie. The prison system in the movie seeks to isolate the deviant members of society classifying them as perverts, neurotic, madmen and in need of reprogramming and evaluation. These technologies in Truffaut's film are the seat of power in a society. Unlike Foucault Truffaut sees power as emanating from these fixed points; Foucault sees "power" and "control" and flowing through all the vessels of the body of society. In Truffaut's disciplinary society their is escape from such a world on the streets of Paris, in interacts with friends, and by running away to the sea or the movie theater. Truffaut sees escape from power as possible in anarchist like state free of adults and laws. Truffaut's ideas are similar in this aspect to Sartre who sees the society can be freed from the grip of cruel power in a socialist utopia. This is in stark contrast to Foucault who sees escape as impossible. And more importantly Foucault sees escape as growing more and more difficult as society moves from a disciplinary society to a society of control.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)